Can Ai Detectors Identify Quillbot Paraphrased Text Accurately
AI detectors like Originality.ai, QuillBot AI Detector, and others aim to identify paraphrased or AI-generated text. Here’s how they compare:
- Originality.ai: Detects QuillBot-paraphrased content with up to 99% accuracy, offering features like false positive reduction (<3%), Chrome integration, and shareable reports.
- QuillBot AI Detector: Provides quick results with a percentage score (0–100%) but shows inconsistent accuracy and false positives.
- BeLikeNative: Focuses on improving text clarity in 80+ languages but lacks AI detection capabilities.
Quick Comparison
| Tool | Detection Accuracy | Languages Supported | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Originality.ai | 96–99% | Multiple | Fact-checking aid, Chrome integration, shareable reports, low false positives |
| QuillBot AI Detector | Inconsistent | 5 (English, Spanish, etc.) | Sentence-level feedback, free scans, quick results |
| BeLikeNative | N/A | 80+ | Real-time text enhancement, grammar correction, no AI detection capabilities |
For reliable AI detection, Originality.ai is the most accurate option, while QuillBot and BeLikeNative cater to niche needs like paraphrasing checks and writing improvements.
Battle of the AI Detectors. Turnitin VS Originality VS QuillBot.
1. Originality.ai Performance
To set a baseline for comparison, we started by testing Originality.ai.
This tool identifies QuillBot-paraphrased content with an impressive 99% accuracy. It offers three detection models tailored for different needs: Lite (with less than 1% false positives), Turbo (under 3%), and Multi Language (accuracy varies by language and region).
"After testing a number of AI content detection tools, I have found Originality.ai to be one of the best on the market. And now with the ability to detect paraphrased AI content, Originality.ai is even more powerful. It’s basically my go-to detection tool at this point."
SEO consultant Glenn Gabe also praised the tool, calling it his "go-to tool for detecting paraphrased AI content".
Originality.ai offers a Chrome integration, readability scoring, and shareable reports. Content agencies appreciate its ease of use and dependability. Additionally, its Fact Checking Aid outperforms major language models in accuracy. These capabilities provide a strong benchmark for evaluating QuillBot’s AI detection, which we’ll dive into next.
2. QuillBot AI Detector Results
QuillBot’s AI Detector provides a percentage score (0–100%) to estimate how likely a piece of text is AI-generated or AI-refined. It categorizes text into four groups: AI-generated, AI-generated and refined, human-written with AI refinements, or purely human-written.
The tool requires a minimum of 80 words for analysis, supports multiple languages including English, Spanish, German, French, and Dutch, and limits free-plan users to 1,200 words per submission. For premium users, pricing is $9.95 per month or $4.17 per month with annual billing.
However, the detector’s performance has shown inconsistencies. For example, ZDNet reported that the same passage received a 45% AI likelihood score in one scan and 0% in another, even though no changes were made. QuillBot itself acknowledges that no detection tool is perfect and advises against relying solely on it for critical decisions.
Key Issues with Detection:
- Inconsistent scores across repeated scans
- False positives for human-written text
- Lack of clear identification of AI-generated sections
- Challenges in differentiating AI-generated content from AI-refined or paraphrased text
While the tool processes text quickly and offers detailed line-by-line reports, its accuracy for high-stakes academic or professional purposes is debatable. For situations where originality is crucial, users are encouraged to use additional verification methods. Up next, we’ll review BeLikeNative’s detection tool to assess its reliability and precision.
sbb-itb-32359dc
3. BeLikeNative Analysis
BeLikeNative takes a different path compared to QuillBot’s detector, focusing on improving writing quality rather than identifying AI-generated content. It’s designed to enhance clarity and fluency across over 80 languages, making it a useful tool for a wide range of users.
The Chrome extension integrates directly with platforms like Google Docs, WhatsApp Web, and Notion, analyzing text in real time – no need for copy-pasting. Subscription plans vary, allowing for daily text analysis limits ranging from 500 to 6,000 characters, with 5 to 125 uses per day. Users can choose between standard or priority processing for their needs.
Instead of pinpointing AI-paraphrased text, BeLikeNative works on refining clarity and fluency. While this makes it a strong option for international content creation, it’s less precise as a dedicated AI detection tool.
Notable technical features include:
- Real-time clipboard analysis
- Options to customize language settings
- Automated grammar and spelling corrections
These features highlight BeLikeNative’s focus on improving text quality. Its role in evaluating authenticity will be explored further in the next section.
Strengths and Limitations
Here’s a breakdown of how Originality.ai, QuillBot AI Detector, and BeLikeNative stack up across key features:
- Originality.ai: Advertises a 96% accuracy rate for detecting paraphrased content. It also includes a Fact-Checking Aid and generates shareable reports for added functionality.
- QuillBot AI Detector: Offers unlimited free scans, provides sentence-level feedback, and delivers quick results. However, it supports only five languages, which could result in missed paraphrased sections in unsupported languages.
- BeLikeNative: Focuses on improving clarity and fluency in over 80 languages. It has daily character limits (500–6,000) and lacks paraphrase detection capabilities.
Each tool has its strengths and trade-offs. QuillBot stands out for its free scans and detailed feedback but falls short with limited language support and no writing enhancements. Originality.ai shines with its high detection accuracy, while BeLikeNative enhances content quality but doesn’t address paraphrasing.
These differences highlight why combining tools might be necessary for thorough verification. Up next, we’ll summarize our key findings.
Key Findings
Here’s what stood out after analyzing each tool:
Originality.ai stands out with an impressive detection accuracy of over 98%, keeping false positives under 3%. QuillBot’s AI Detector is quick but provides inconsistent AI-likelihood scores. Meanwhile, BeLikeNative focuses on improving writing clarity in more than 80 languages but does not include AI-detection capabilities.
These high-accuracy AI detection tools help writers and educators ensure originality, even as they incorporate AI-driven writing aids into their workflows.
